Education & Pedagogy

Naturalism in Education

Naturalism
Written by Arshad Yousafzai

Naturalism in Education

Naturalism is a Philosophical viewpoint that describes about all the natural occurrences in terms of natural laws. Nature is the ultimate reality, described using concepts such as motion and energy.

Positivism is another name for Naturalism, which implies that natural phenomena can be explained through scientific laws and fall within the scope of one or more positive sciences. The founder of Positivism, a French thinker named August Comte, played a critical role in shaping this philosophical perspective.  Naturalists believe natural laws are universal and necessary, affirming the principle of Nature’s uniformity. As a result, different natural occurrences are considered to transpire mechanically and without any purpose.

What is Naturalism in Education

Naturalism in education is a philosophical approach that believes nature is the ultimate source of knowledge and values. It holds that education should be based on the natural processes of human development and that the role of the educator is to facilitate and support the natural growth of the learner.

According to Naturalism, education should be centered on the needs and interests of the learner rather than on the demands of society or the curriculum. It emphasizes the importance of experiential learning, where learners are encouraged to explore the natural world and discover knowledge through their observations and experiences. In Naturalism, the teacher is seen as a guide or facilitator rather than an authoritarian figure. The teacher’s role is to provide a supportive and stimulating environment that encourages the learner to discover their potential and develop their interests and abilities.

Naturalism also emphasizes the importance of individuality and diversity in education. It recognizes that each learner is unique and has talents, interests, and learning styles. Therefore, instruction should be tailored to the individual needs of each learner rather than following a standardized approach.

Meaning of Naturalism in education

Naturalism in education refers to a philosophical approach that asserts that education should be based on natural human development and learning processes.  It believes that the natural world is the ultimate source of knowledge and values and that education should be centered on the learner’s interests, needs, and experiences.

Define Naturalism in Education

According to Naturalism, the educator’s role is to facilitate the learner’s growth by providing an environment that encourages them to explore and discover knowledge through their observations and experiences. This approach emphasizes the importance of experiential learning, which allows the learner to interact with their environment and gain knowledge through direct engagement with the natural world.

Concept of Naturalism in Education

Naturalism in education also highlights the importance of individuality and diversity in the learning process. It recognizes that each learner is different and has their own talents, interests, and ways of learning. Because of this, each learner’s education should be made to fit their own needs.

Naturalism in education prioritizes the learner’s holistic growth and development, appreciation for the natural world, and the cultivation of their own potential.  It is a philosophy that places great emphasis on the value of biological processes and experiences in the learning process.

Philosophical Presuppositions of Naturalism

Naturalism is a philosophy that regards Nature as the ultimate reality. According to this view, the material world is what exists. In epistemology, naturalists are empiricists, which means they believe that knowledge is acquired through the senses and the brain. They do not accept that all ability is innate, as rationalists do.

In modern Western philosophy, British philosophers John Locke, Bishop Berkeley, and David Hume were empiricists who believed in the possibility of direct knowledge.

Regarding Axiology, Naturalists believe living according to Nature is the best way of life. Their slogan is “Follow Nature,” and their motto is “Be natural.” They are pluralists because Nature has created each person differently.

Philosophical Forms or Types of Naturalism

From the standpoint of philosophical principles, the following three forms of Naturalism are distinguished:

  1. The naturalism of the Physical World
  2. Mechanical Positivism.
  3. Biological Naturalism

 The naturalism of the Physical World

 The Naturalism of the physical world seeks to explain human actions, experiences, emotions, and feelings based on the principles of physical sciences. It aims to understand the entire universe through the lens of physical sciences.

However, its impact in the field of education is limited as it places science above all other forms of knowledge. Naturalism posits that science is the only valid form of knowledge, including philosophical knowledge, which it regards as worthless.

Mechanical Positivism

Mechanical Positivism is a principle that views the universe as a machine made of matter and driven by self-driving energy. It suggests that everything that exists is a form of matter, making it a form of materialism. Human beings are seen as active machines that are activated by environmental influences. This principle influenced the behavioral school in psychology, which explained human behavior in terms of stimulus and response, without acknowledging any separate consciousness. Behaviorists also explain mental processes such as imagination and memory in physiological terms. This school sees no distinction between humans and animals, as both can be explained in terms of stimulus and response. As a result, Mechanical Positivism has had a significant impact on education.

 Biological Naturalism

Biological Naturalism is a type of Naturalism that has had a significant impact on education. It explains that the evolution of humans and animals is a single process and that humans inherit their Nature from their ancestors. It rejects the idea of a spiritual nature in humans and highlights the similarities between human and animal behavior.

In Biological Naturalism, evolution is more important than physical and mechanical processes. All living beings have the instinct to live, and life evolves from lower to higher and more complex forms. This process is not limited to the physical level but also extends to the mental, moral, and spiritual groups in humans.

Evolution occurs at individual and group levels and is governed by the principles of struggle for existence and survival of the fittest. Charles Darwin believed that the principle of self-preservation is the most vital law of Nature.

Naturalism Aims of Education 

The Naturalist approach to education has a biological and evolutionist perspective regarding its aims. However, there is variation within the Naturalist school regarding the objectives of education. Mechanical Naturalism suggests that education should focus on improving the efficiency and perfection of the human machine, but this concept does not fully represent the Naturalist view.

Biological evolutionists use education to ensure the proper adaptation of the child to their environment, transforming, synthesizing, and sublimating their instincts. Darwinists argue that education should train individuals to struggle successfully for their own survival. Lamarck and his followers agree with the concept of biological evolution, and their aim of education is also adaptation to the environment.

Herbert Spencer believed education was preparation and training for a complete life, while Bernard Shaw believed education should aim to stimulate and sustain social development to benefit future generations. T.P. Nunn believed education should focus on developing an individual’s own individuality while contributing to society.

Naturalists of the 19th and 20th centuries believed that education should achieve a synthesis and adjustment between the individual, society, and Nature. Rousseau believed education should develop the child according to their natural ability, and this idea is still accepted today.

However, the Naturalist approach to education is narrow, as it fails to include the spiritual aspect of man’s Nature. By including the spiritual aspect, it could potentially bridge the gap between idealism and Naturalism.

Naturalism Curriculum

Naturalist philosophy has been heavily influenced by science, particularly evolutionary theory, empirical teaching, and scientific analysis. Because of this emphasis on scientific study, Naturalists believe that physical and social sciences are more important than the humanities and should be introduced at every level of education. The curriculum of Naturalism emphasizes the study of natural phenomena and scientific principles, as well as the practical application of scientific knowledge to everyday life. The aim is to produce individuals who are scientifically literate and can contribute to the progress and development of society through their knowledge and skills. However, some critics argue that the exclusive focus on science can lead to a neglect of other important areas of study, such as the arts and humanities, which can provide a broader perspective on human experience and contribute to the development of creativity and critical thinking skills.

For Naturalists, language and mathematics are tools for learning science and should only be taught if they assist in learning science. Literature should not overshadow the importance of science in education. The curriculum should encourage learners to take an interest in science and gain factual and objective knowledge. Naturalists value historical study as it provides valuable suggestions for constructing a new social structure and planning for the future.

Since Naturalists believe in the evolution of man from the animal stage, they want education to develop instincts and emotions. However, there are differing opinions on curriculum among Naturalists. Comenius believed in studying every subject without making any selection, but Locke refuted this notion by emphasizing the need to modify the curriculum to suit the needs of the individual.

Herbert Spencer arranged the curriculum with science as its core and synthesized other subjects to science. He gave the arts a secondary place in his program, believing that one must first create the basic elements before refining or making them sophisticated. T.H. Huxley, on the other hand, attached greater importance to the cultural aspects of life than to the study of science.

Modern Naturalists do not stress the importance of any subject over another, but attach more importance to the sciences. The arts are also given an important place in the curriculum to provide a broad base of education.

Educational Methods in Naturalism

Naturalist education places the child at the center and advocates for leaving the child to learn from Nature without interference from society or the state. Therefore, the primary method of teaching is to allow the child to learn freely from Nature. Traditional methods of education are rejected in favor of more positive techniques that provide the child with actual experiences.

Sensory training is believed to be the first stage of a child’s education, as advocated by Locke. Direct experience is emphasized over books, and it is argued that the child learns more by experiencing Nature, people, and objects firsthand. This is particularly true for science, where practical work in the laboratory is preferred, and for geometry, which is better taught by calculating the configuration of actual objects and spaces rather than hypothetical problems in textbooks.

Naturalists suggest that geography and history can be taught more effectively through tours of places of interest rather than relying solely on maps and charts. As such, Naturalistic educational methods rely on direct experience and personal observation rather than textbooks. The two forms of education suggested by Naturalist thinkers are not interfering with the child’s natural growth and allowing the child to learn from Nature.

 Positive Method or Positive Learning in Naturalism

Naturalism is a philosophical perspective that emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence and scientific inquiry in understanding the world. This perspective can also be applied to education, where it emphasizes the importance of experiential learning and encourages a positive approach to education. In this article, we will explore the concept of positive method or positive learning in Naturalism, its key principles, and its benefits.

What is Positive Method or Positive Learning in Naturalism?

The positive method or positive learning in Naturalism is a teaching method that emphasizes the use of positive reinforcement and encourages learners to develop their natural curiosity and love for learning. In this method, the teacher creates a positive learning environment where students feel comfortable, confident, and motivated to learn.

This method is based on the assumption that humans are inherently curious and that learning is a natural and enjoyable process. It also recognizes that learning occurs best when students are engaged and motivated, and when the learning experience is relevant and meaningful to them.

Read the Difference between Naturalism, Pragmatism, and Existentialism

Key Principles of Positive Method or Positive Learning in Naturalism

 

The followings are the key principles of the positive method or positive learning in Naturalism:

  1. Student-Centered Approach: In this approach, the teacher focuses on the needs and interests of the learners. The teacher encourages students to take an active role in their learning and provides them with opportunities to explore and discover.
  2. Positive Reinforcement: Positive reinforcement is used to encourage learners to continue their learning and to reinforce positive behaviors. This can include verbal praise, rewards, and recognition.
  3. Experiential Learning: Experiential learning is a hands-on approach to learning that encourages students to learn through experience. The teacher creates opportunities for students to explore, experiment, and make mistakes.
  4. Meaningful Learning: Meaningful learning occurs when students can relate new information to their own experiences and knowledge. The teacher helps students to make connections between what they are learning and their real-life experiences.
  5. Collaborative Learning: Collaborative learning involves working together in groups to solve problems, share ideas, and learn from each other. The teacher creates opportunities for students to work in pairs or small groups to enhance their learning.

 

Benefits of Positive Method or Positive Learning in Naturalism

 

The positive method or positive learning in Naturalism has many benefits for both students and teachers. Some of these benefits include:

  1. Increased Engagement: When students are engaged and motivated, they are more likely to participate actively in the learning process. The positive method encourages students to take an active role in their learning, which increases engagement and motivation.
  2. Improved Retention: When students are actively engaged in their learning, they are more likely to retain the information. The positive method encourages students to relate new information to their own experiences, which helps to improve retention.
  3. Positive Learning Environment: The positive method creates a positive learning environment where students feel comfortable, confident, and motivated to learn. This positive environment helps to enhance the learning experience.
  4. Improved Collaboration: The positive method encourages collaborative learning, which helps to improve communication, teamwork, and problem-solving skills. Students learn from each other and are able to share their ideas and knowledge.
  5. Enhanced Creativity: The positive method encourages students to think creatively and to explore new ideas. This enhances creativity and helps students to develop their critical thinking skills.

 

Negative Method or Negative Learning in Naturalism

 

The negative method or negative learning in Naturalism is a teaching method that focuses on the weaknesses and limitations of individuals instead their strengths. While it emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and skepticism, it can lead to low motivation, limited creativity, and a negative learning environment. It may not be relevant to all learners and may limit opportunities for collaboration and the exploration of new ideas. By being aware of its limitations, educators can make informed decisions about when and how to use the negative method in their teaching practice.

Naturalism is a philosophical perspective that emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence and scientific inquiry in understanding the world. This perspective can also be applied to education, where it emphasizes the importance of experiential learning and encourages a positive approach to education. In contrast, the negative method or negative learning in Naturalism is a teaching method that focuses on the limitations and weaknesses of individuals rather than their strengths. Here, we will explore the concept of negative method or negative learning in Naturalism, its key principles, and its limitations.

 

What is Negative Method or Negative Learning in Naturalism?

The negative method or negative learning in Naturalism is a teaching method that focuses on the weaknesses, mistakes, and limitations of individuals rather than their strengths. This method assumes that humans are flawed and that learning occurs best when individuals are aware of their limitations and mistakes. It also emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and skepticism in the learning process.

Key Principles of Negative Learning in Naturalism

The following are the key principles of the negative method or negative learning in Naturalism:

  1. Criticism and Skepticism: This method encourages learners to be critical and skeptical of information presented to them. They are encouraged to question assumptions and to be aware of the limitations of their own knowledge.
  2. Weakness-based Learning: In this method, learners focus on their weaknesses and limitations rather than their strengths. They are encouraged to identify areas of weakness and to work on improving them.
  3. Error Correction: This method emphasizes the importance of correcting errors and mistakes. Learners are encouraged to identify their mistakes and to work on correcting them.
  4. Individual Learning: This method emphasizes individual learning rather than collaborative learning. Learners are encouraged to work independently and to focus on their own weaknesses.
  5. Challenging Learning: This method provides learners with challenging tasks and problems. They are encouraged to push themselves beyond their comfort zones and to take risks.

Limitations of Negative Method or Negative Learning in Naturalism

The negative method or negative learning in Naturalism has several limitations. Some of these limitations include:

  1. Low Motivation: Focusing on weaknesses rather than strengths can lead to low motivation and a negative attitude towards learning.
  2. Limited Creativity: This method can limit creativity and the exploration of new ideas. Learners may be discouraged from taking risks or trying new approaches.
  3. Limited Collaboration: This method emphasizes individual learning rather than collaborative learning. This can limit opportunities for learners to work together and to learn from each other.
  4. Negative Learning Environment: This method can create a negative learning environment where learners feel discouraged and criticized rather than supported and encouraged.
  5. Limited Relevance: This method may not be relevant to all learners. Some learners may respond better to positive reinforcement and a focus on their strengths rather than their weaknesses

The Role of Teacher in Naturalism

The traditional approach to education where teachers use punishment to push students towards the desired direction is opposed. Naturalists believe that childhood is an important period in itself and should not only be seen as a stepping stone to adult life.

As such, they encourage the play way technique of education which emphasizes that children should enjoy their childhood as much as possible with minimal interference from teachers.

This approach reduces the importance and respect that teachers are traditionally accorded, with Neil’s Summerhill School providing a good example of this. At Summerhill, educators mixed and played with learners, even lived with them, and the learners formed a cabinet of five people who were responsible for discipline. The educator’s role was to remove difficulties after discussing them with the learners. Therefore, educators in this school were just one of the members of the school.

Naturalists suggest that teachers should be guides and friends, and in their interactions with students, teachers should try to remember their own childhood and infancy. Children are naturally happy, and therefore, teachers should be jolly and not grave, as seriousness depresses children. The educator’s role is primarily negative since they are required to protect children’s inherent goodness from bad influences in the environment. Teachers are responsible for creating an environment where children can experience the most freedom. They must study children’s psychology and intervene in their activity only when necessary. Education’s goal is to provide opportunities for unrestricted self-expression.

The role of the teacher is to protect the child from repression, mental conflicts, and mental disorders. Naturalism warns teachers against unnecessary seriousness, the desire to assert their authority, and physical punishment, as these have a detrimental effect on the child’s development.

Educators should focus on what they should avoid rather than what they should do. They can do even better by literally becoming a child when dealing with children. However, their guidance is apparent when they can give a positive and confident opinion on controversial matters. They should also guide children in their search for new things and train them in new techniques so that they can become capable of doing things on their own later in life.

Ross defines the teacher’s role in naturalistic education as being an observer of the child’s development rather than a giver of information, ideas, ideals, and will power or a molder of character. The child forges these things for themselves, as they know better what they should learn, when and how they should learn it. Their education is the free development of their interests and motives rather than an artificial effort by an educator.

Therefore, the educator should never use any kind of pressure or force, even their own authority. Their task is to provide a theatre for the child’s acting, to collect the materials required, to provide children with an opportunity to do as they like, and to create an ideal environment.

Many of the latest techniques of education, such as the Montessori system, Dalton plan, Project method, etc., all grant teachers a similar status compared to the naturalistic philosophy. In contrast, the idealistic school grants teachers a more responsible position. The educator is considered to have gone through the same situations as the learner and is no less a part of the intellectual world than anyone else. Both the educator and the learner are two elements of the organic structure of the universe, with their own status and role in God’s plan. The educator teaches and guides the learner along the path of perfection.

In the naturalistic organization of education, the educator’s role is clarified by the example of Froebel’s kindergarten system. In this system, the school is considered to be a garden, the learner a delicate plant, and the educator a careful, responsible, and cautious gardener. The plant grows by itself, seeks its nourishment, and its development is governed by natural laws. It is impossible to turn one plant into another

Discipline in Naturalism Philosophy

The discipline in Naturalism Philosophy is contrary to traditional concepts of discipline, including physical punishment, which Naturalist philosophers oppose because they believe it leads to undesirable conflict in children.

According to Rousseau, children should not be punished, and liberty is the greatest good. Children should receive natural consequences for their mistakes, which will help them learn to distinguish between right and wrong.

Naturalist philosophers believe that discipline should not interfere with a child’s activity, but external and obvious discipline should be eliminated. The child should be left to make and obey their own rules for school administration and organization.

Discipline is instilled in a child’s mind through natural consequences, but there are limits to this method of learning. Sometimes it becomes necessary to scold or even punish a child who repeats harmful activities. Nature’s discipline is not a word and a blow, but the blow without a word. Therefore, abandoning the child to learn through natural consequences alone is not enough.

It is essential to caution children and warn them against certain activities. The system of reward and punishment has proven effective, but it is crucial to remember that the value of the Naturalist concept lies in its recognition of the shortcomings of excessive external discipline, even though the theory is one-sided.

School Organization in Naturalism

The philosophy of Naturalism recognizes two main types of educational agencies: formal and informal. Formal agencies refer to educational institutions like schools, while informal agencies include the family, community, society, and state. Among these, the family is the primary agency responsible for the education of the child.

Naturalism views the state as having a significant influence on formal educational agencies. Naturalists believe that schools should be organized based on natural laws and should promote a liberal and free atmosphere. According to Naturalists, Nature itself is a school where children learn according to biological principles.

The Naturalist philosophy highly values democratic values such as liberty, equality, and fraternity. Schools should provide a social environment based on these principles. Naturalists believe that teachers should have a minimal role in the classroom, and students should govern the school themselves. Students should receive leadership training to support their self-governance. The timetable of the school should be flexible to allow for more freedom.

The Naturalist school organization can be found in the Dalton plan, where classes are replaced with laboratories, and there is no fixed timetable. The school buildings should have proper arrangements for light and air. Rousseau recommended organizing schools according to the Nature of children and their stages of development.

 Contribution of Naturalism to Education

Naturalism has made significant contributions to education, much like other philosophies of education. One of its key contributions is the promotion of child-centered education, emphasizing the importance of the child’s Nature and innate goodness. Naturalism also emphasizes the psychological aspect of education and the need for children to be free and self-reliant in their learning.

Education should be related to both Nature and society, and should be based on developmental psychology, with a democratic and multisided approach. Additionally, Naturalism recognizes the natural stages of development and strives to make education natural to these stages.

These points are now discussed in detail below.

Child-Centered Education

Naturalism has made significant contributions to education by promoting child-centered education, emphasizing the importance of psychology, promoting freedom and self-dependence, relating education to Nature and society, emphasizing developmental psychology, advocating for democracy, promoting a multidisciplinary approach, and tailoring education to the stages of development.

Naturalism views the child as the primary focus of education. It stresses that the Nature of the child should guide education, and the child’s natural inclination is always good. Therefore, the child is naturally endowed with all goodness, and education’s primary purpose is to provide an environment that encourages the child to develop his innate goodness.

Naturalism also emphasizes that the educator can perform only the function of a guide. The child is not to be transformed through education or to apply adult standards to him. Education, according to Naturalism, is not the preparation for life but life itself, and children should live like children because childhood has its significance and is not merely a stepping stone to adulthood.

Overall, Naturalism’s contributions to education have emphasized the importance of the child’s Nature, the need to provide a natural environment, and the promotion of freedom, self-dependence, and democracy.

Naturalism Emphasis upon psychology

The Naturalistic Philosophy of Education greatly influenced the emphasis on psychology in the field of education. Naturalists believed that education should follow the child’s Nature and emphasized the importance of observing and studying the child in order to determine normal and abnormal development. This led to a focus on child psychology and the realization that a child’s mental activities differ from adults.

Rousseau was one of the first educationists to stress the importance of understanding the child’s Nature before educating them. This idea was put into practice by other educators like Pestalozzi, Herbert, and Froebel. The introduction of psychology into education led to the emergence of a distinct branch of psychology called educational psychology.

Psychologists like William McDougall and Thorndike contributed valuable knowledge on child psychology, and the examination of the various stages of child development led to the adoption of different techniques of teaching at each stage. It was also found that children differed from each other in many ways, leading to the need for flexible education to accommodate these variations.

The Psychoanalysts, especially Freud, had a significant impact on education by providing knowledge on the harmful effects of repression and the child’s attitude towards authority. Psychoanalysis also helped to explain the causes of juvenile delinquency and suggested ways to cure it. The influence of Naturalism on education led to a greater emphasis on child psychology and a more flexible approach to education that accommodates the individual differences of each child.

Emphasis upon Free Choice

Naturalists believe that education should not impose a set curriculum or restrict a child’s choices. Instead, the child should be free to choose what they want to learn, play, and how they want to behave without external constraints. Some Naturalists even oppose the idea of school education, considering it an obstacle to a child’s independent development. However, others argue that the home environment is not necessarily freer due to constant interruptions by parents.

Naturalists also oppose teaching all students in the same way or using a fixed timetable. For example, Summerhill School, founded by A.S. Neil, gave children complete freedom to play throughout the day if they wished. Religious education was not taught since children are not naturally inclined towards it, and no adult values were imposed on them.

Naturalists believe that a child should not be made cultured unless they realize the need for it. Therefore, they prefer to leave the child in their more primitive condition. Liberty is granted to children, even allowing them to roam naked if they wish. It has been found that coeducation generates a healthy attitude towards sex, and undesirable behavior is the result of moral and unnatural repression. Neil believed that no undesirable incidents take place due to co-education if the environment is completely free and liberal.

Place of the Teacher in Naturalism 

The philosophy of Naturalism places great importance on allowing children to make their own choices in education and behavior.

Teachers are seen as friends and guides, rather than administrators who impose rules and influence the child. The role of the teacher is to provide educational materials and create a positive learning environment, but to avoid interfering with the child’s natural interests and instincts.

Self-education is encouraged, and children may even be allowed to educate each other. The educator’s role is to observe, protect the child from defects and a negative environment, and offer love and sympathy.

When bad tendencies arise, the educator should guide the child through informal conversations, showing understanding and encouraging the child to solve their own problems. Naturalists believe in allowing children to develop independently, with minimal interference from adults.

Naturalism Focus on Direct Experiences

Naturalists believe in Rousseau’s statement, “Do not give your student verbal lessons, he should be taught by experience alone.” Therefore, Naturalists emphasize teaching through direct experience. Children will learn more by interacting with the objects around them than through books. They should be allowed to examine these objects themselves.

Similarly, science should not be taught through lectures, but through actual experiments in the laboratory. Geometry should not be taught through problems in textbooks, but through the actual measurement of areas, heights, and dimensions of school buildings and other objects. If geography is to be taught, learners should be taken to various parts of the country, rather than only taught through maps and charts on the blackboard.

Thus, Naturalists insist that learners must learn from the things that exist in the school, rather than solely through the lectures of the educator.

Direct Experience of Social Life

Naturalists believe that just as the child should learn from the natural environment around him, he should also learn from the social environment in which he lives. This means that he should learn about social duties, obligations, and responsibilities not through lectures, but through the natural society of the school, of which he is a member. By being left to himself, he will learn what to do and what to avoid. In Neil’s Summerhill School, for example, children themselves decided upon the form of behavior which others found objectionable or which hindered their adjustment, and thus learnt to avoid it. This formed the basis of the child’s social education. Naturalists also favor co-education, as they believe that it creates a school society that resembles the society outside of school more closely. They argue that segregated education of boys and girls can lead to unnatural attitudes toward sex, although this is a controversial subject among educationists. However, the Naturalists believe that the child’s experience of social life within the school forms the basis of his later social and moral life.

Self-Government and Naturalism 

 

The Naturalist approach to education also emphasizes the importance of self-government. At Neil’s Summerhill School, learners were given the opportunity to form their own government, consisting of a cabinet of five learners who met every Saturday night to discuss and make decisions on various issues, including cases of indiscipline and punishment. Although the cabinet had the authority to expel a learner from the school, this right was never exercised.

According to Neil, this arrangement helped develop highly democratic qualities in the learners, and the weekly meeting had a greater impact than a week of traditional teaching. Self-government allows learners to learn self-discipline and self-control through their own rules and regulations, rather than external control. This method of teaching public morality and cultured behavior is considered highly beneficial, and it promotes co-operation among learners. While self-government may impose certain restrictions on learners’ activities, it fosters self-discipline and has none of the drawbacks of external control.

Naturalism and Play Way Method Teaching 

Naturalists prefer the play way as a method of education. In this technique, children learn through playing or indulging in sports. Psychologists believe that children best manifest their instincts and tendencies in independent play, and that their development can be achieved through sports. Playing affords education not only during childhood, but also in adult life. Games are an important medium of constructive education. Naturalists stress the value of games; a fact which modern educationists also accept. Nowadays, the play way of education is adopted for the education of infants and children, and thus they acquire all the advantages of a Naturalist education.

Montessori education is a good example of this, as in this method of teaching, children learn even reading and writing through play. Scouting is another activity in which children learn many things through the medium of play. In Neil’s Summerhill School, stress was placed on character development rather than on learning. Children were free to play from morning till evening, and attendance for lessons was never compulsory. On the other hand, learners favored the crafts rooms more, where they were taught to make things out of wood, plastering, and metal. Learners and educators sat together to write plays, as drama writing is an important means of developing the creative imagination.

Development of the Child According to its Nature

Naturalists emphasized the importance of allowing each child to develop according to their own unique Nature. They believed that educational methods must be adapted to meet the varying needs of children, as each child has their own inherent individual differences.

Importance of Developmental Psychology

Naturalism emphasizes the importance of studying child development, and this has led to significant contributions to the field of developmental psychology. Through the study of children, Naturalists have provided insights into how humans develop and how education can be tailored to individual needs. By understanding the various stages of development, Naturalists have been able to create educational programs that are appropriate for different age groups and promote optimal learning. This has helped to establish developmental psychology as an important field of study and has led to further advancements in understanding human growth and development.

Comprehensive Curriculum

Naturalists have favored the adoption of a comprehensive curriculum that reflects the holistic approach in education. It encompasses a wide range of subjects, including sciences, arts, and extracurricular activities. It also emphasizes the use of modern audiovisual aids to enhance the learning experience. By providing learners with a well-rounded education that caters to their diverse needs and interests, a comprehensive curriculum in Naturalism prepares learners for success in the real world.

Comprehensive curriculum is a crucial aspect of Naturalism, as it emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach in education. A comprehensive curriculum encompasses a wide range of subjects, including sciences, arts, and extracurricular activities. The purpose of such a curriculum is to provide learners with a well-rounded education that caters to their diverse needs and interests.

The scientific tendency in Naturalism is reflected in the inclusion of subjects like mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology in the curriculum. These subjects are essential for developing the analytical and critical thinking skills of learners. They provide a solid foundation for learners to understand the natural world and the principles that govern it. In addition, they also prepare learners for further studies in specialized fields like engineering, medicine, and technology.

The sociological tendency in Naturalism is reflected in the inclusion of subjects like history, geography, economics, and politics in the curriculum. These subjects provide learners with an understanding of the social, cultural, and political systems that shape their lives. They help learners to develop a sense of empathy and social responsibility, which is essential for building a just and equitable society.

The psychological tendency in Naturalism is reflected in the inclusion of subjects like psychology, sociology, and education in the curriculum. These subjects provide learners with an understanding of human behavior, emotions, and cognition. They help learners to develop self-awareness, social skills, and emotional intelligence, which are essential for building healthy relationships and achieving personal and professional success.

Extracurricular programs and activities are also an essential component of a comprehensive curriculum in Naturalism. These activities include sports, arts, music, drama, and community service. They provide learners with an opportunity to explore their interests, develop their talents, and build their character. Extracurricular activities also promote socialization, teamwork, and leadership skills, which are essential for success in the real world.

The use of modern audiovisual aids is another crucial aspect of a comprehensive curriculum in Naturalism. These aids include computers, multimedia projectors, interactive whiteboards, and the internet. They provide learners with access to a vast array of information and resources that can enhance their learning experience. The use of audiovisual aids also makes learning more engaging, interactive, and enjoyable, which is essential for promoting a love for learning.

Development of Democratic Qualities

Naturalism places great emphasis on the development of democratic qualities in learners. It rejects the traditional authoritarian methods of teaching and encourages a more liberal and progressive approach. This rejection of traditional methods leads to the development of qualities like liberty, equality, and fraternity.

In a Naturalist system of education, learners are not subjected to repression or vigorous discipline. Instead, they are allowed to develop at their own pace and in their own way. This kind of education seeks to replace dogmatic teachings with more modern and liberal ones. Naturalism promotes the idea of self-government, where learners are given the freedom to make their own decisions and take responsibility for their own actions.

Through self-government, learners learn to develop democratic qualities. Naturalism believes that learners should be allowed to govern themselves and make decisions for the community. At Neil’s Summerhill School, learners were given the opportunity to form their own government, which consisted of a cabinet of five learners. The cabinet was responsible for making decisions on various issues and even had the power to expel a learner from the school if necessary. Through this system, learners learned to make decisions, develop leadership skills, and work cooperatively with others.

The development of democratic qualities is an important aspect of a Naturalist system of education. Learners learn to respect the rights of others and to work together to achieve common goals. They learn to appreciate diversity and to value the opinions of others. Naturalism promotes the idea of equality, where every learner is given equal opportunities to learn and develop. This creates an environment where learners feel valued and respected, and are able to reach their full potential.

Development of Child Psychology

 

The Naturalist approach to education has played an important role in the development of child psychology. By emphasizing the importance of individualized education and the unique characteristics of childhood, Naturalists have contributed to a deeper understanding of child development and the role that education plays in shaping a child’s psychology and character.

Naturalists played a significant role in the development of child psychology as a result of their insistence on education being oriented to the child’s Nature. As a result of this development in child psychology, it was discovered that the child is not a young adult, but a distinct kind of human being possessed of a different psychology. Naturalists insist that the child is born good, and that education must seek only to protect him from evil.

The Naturalist approach to education has contributed significantly to the development of child psychology. Naturalists emphasized that education should be tailored to the individual needs and Nature of the child, which led to a better understanding of child development and psychology.

Prior to the Naturalist movement, education was often rigid and focused on strict discipline and rote learning, without considering the unique needs and interests of the child. Naturalists rejected this approach and instead advocated for a more child-centered approach that takes into account the child’s innate tendencies and interests.

This emphasis on individualized education helped to further the field of child psychology by promoting the study of child development and the unique characteristics of childhood. Naturalists believed that children are not simply small versions of adults, but rather, have their own distinct psychology that must be considered in the educational process.

Through this approach, Naturalists helped to uncover important insights into child psychology, such as the idea that children are naturally curious and inclined to explore their environment. They also emphasized the importance of play as a means of learning and development, recognizing that children learn best when they are engaged in activities that interest them.

Moreover, Naturalists believed that children are inherently good, and that it is the role of education to protect them from evil and negative influences. This perspective led to a greater understanding of the role that education plays in shaping a child’s moral development and character.

Naturalism Supports Residential Schools

Naturalists support residential schools because they provide a conducive learning environment that fosters growth and development. They also advocate for co-education as it helps in developing more natural attitudes in learners. Residential schools play a vital role in promoting the overall development of learners and fostering a well-rounded personality.

Naturalists support the concept of residential schools where learners live in hostels attached to the school. The reason for this is that in a residential setting, the educator can better control the learner’s environment and provide them with a wholesome atmosphere that fosters growth and development. This is important because Naturalists believe that the educator’s role is not just to teach, but also to protect the learner from evil influences.

Moreover, co-education is also favored by Naturalists as it helps in developing more natural attitudes in boys and girls. By studying and living together, learners get the opportunity to understand and appreciate each other’s perspectives and develop healthy relationships based on mutual respect and understanding.

Residential schools provide a unique opportunity for learners to immerse themselves in a learning environment that is supportive, nurturing, and engaging. They allow for a more holistic approach to education, where learners can participate in a range of activities beyond academics, such as sports, music, drama, and other extracurricular activities. This helps in promoting the overall development of learners and fosters a well-rounded personality.

The residential setting also enables learners to develop a sense of community and belongingness, which is vital for their emotional and psychological well-being. They get the opportunity to form lasting friendships, learn important social skills, and develop a sense of responsibility and independence.

However, it is important to note that Naturalists do not advocate for strict discipline or repression in residential schools. Instead, they emphasize the importance of a supportive and non-authoritarian learning environment that allows learners to grow and develop at their own pace. Naturalists believe that the educator’s role is to facilitate learning, not to impose it.

Revolution in All Fields of Education

Naturalists were accountable for some of the most groundbreaking and progressive concepts in the sphere of education. They were fervent in their opposition towards traditional viewpoints on child psychology, educational techniques, curriculum, administration, and co-education. Though not all their ideas are currently accepted, many of their principles are still being employed. The principles of education that were first proposed by the Naturalists, such as learning through activity, moving from simple to complex, from concrete to abstract, from definite to indefinite, from easy to difficult, and from known to unknown, have all been substantiated as accurate.

In the present day, contemporary educationists have come to a consensus that the purpose of education is not to simply provide information, but to stimulate spontaneous development. The importance and effectiveness of a broad-based and comprehensive curriculum have been almost universally recognized. Repression and frustration are now considered to be harmful in all aspects of education. Furthermore, the role of the teacher is now widely regarded as that of a guide, rather than an administrator.

FAQs

 

What Are the Principles of Naturalism in Education?

Naturalism is a philosophy that believes in the power of Nature and the natural world. In the field of education, Naturalism emphasizes the importance of allowing children to learn through their natural surroundings and experiences.

The principles of Naturalism in education include:

  1. Education should be child-centered – Naturalism emphasizes the importance of the child’s needs and interests in the learning process. Teachers should encourage children to learn through exploration and discovery.
  2. Learning should be experiential – Naturalism believes children learn best through firsthand experiences. Teachers should provide opportunities for children to explore their environment and learn through observation, experimentation, and discovery.
  3. Nature should be a primary teacher – Naturalism views Nature as a powerful force that can teach children essential lessons about the world around them. Teachers should use Nature as a tool for learning and incorporate outdoor activities into the curriculum.
  4. The role of the teacher is to guide – Naturalism believes that teachers should act as guides, rather than lecturers. Teachers should facilitate learning by asking questions and encouraging children to explore and discover on their own.
  5. Individual differences should be respected – Naturalism recognizes that every child is unique, and therefore requires different approaches to learning. Teachers should strive to create a learning environment that accommodates the diverse needs and interests of each child.

What Are the Examples of Naturalism in Education?

Naturalism in education promotes a holistic approach to learning, emphasizing the importance of Nature, experiential learning, and child-led education. By incorporating these principles into their teaching, teachers can create a stimulating learning environment that fosters creativity, curiosity, and a love for learning. It emphasizes the importance of hands-on experiences, outdoor activities, and learning through Nature.

Here are some examples of Naturalism in education:

  1. Nature-based education – Teachers can use Nature as a primary tool for teaching. They can take students on outdoor field trips, such as hiking or camping, and encourage them to explore and observe the natural world. Teachers can also incorporate outdoor activities, such as gardening, into the curriculum to teach children about biology and ecology.
  2. Child-led learning – In Naturalism, education is child-centered, and teachers prioritize the interests and needs of each child. Teachers can encourage children to follow their passions and interests and design their own learning experiences. For example, if a child is interested in animals, the teacher can create a curriculum that revolves around animals, including books, videos, and hands-on activities.
  3. Experiential learning – Naturalism emphasizes the importance of learning through firsthand experiences. Teachers can create activities that allow children to explore and experiment. For example, a science teacher can conduct experiments to teach children about the laws of physics or chemistry. Similarly, a social studies teacher can create simulations that allow children to experience historical events.
  4. Multisensory learning – Naturalism recognizes that every child learns differently, and therefore, requires different approaches to learning. Teachers can incorporate multisensory activities into the curriculum to accommodate different learning styles. For example, a teacher can use music, art, or drama to teach a subject, making the learning experience more engaging and enjoyable.

What Are the Implications and the Characteristics of Naturalism in Education?

 

Naturalism in education has several implications that affect the way teachers approach learning and how students learn. Here are some of the implications of Naturalism in education:

  1. Learning through experiences – Naturalism emphasizes the importance of learning through firsthand experiences. Teachers should create opportunities for students to explore and discover, encouraging them to learn by doing. This approach to learning can lead to a deeper understanding of the subject matter and a greater retention of knowledge.
  2. Emphasis on Nature – Naturalism views Nature as a powerful force that can teach children important lessons about the world around them. Teachers should incorporate outdoor activities and nature-based learning into the curriculum. This can lead to a greater appreciation for Nature and the environment.
  3. Child-centered approach – Naturalism prioritizes the needs and interests of the child in the learning process. Teachers should design a curriculum that accommodates the diverse needs and interests of each child. This can lead to a more personalized learning experience and a greater engagement in the learning process.
  4. Learning through play – Naturalism recognizes the importance of play in the learning process. Teachers should incorporate play-based learning activities into the curriculum. This can lead to a more enjoyable learning experience and can help students develop social, emotional, and cognitive skills.
  5. Teacher as a guide – Naturalism views the teacher as a guide, rather than a lecturer. Teachers should facilitate learning by asking questions, encouraging exploration and discovery, and providing guidance when needed. This can lead to a more collaborative learning environment and can help students develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

What Are the Aims of Naturalism in Education?

The aims of Naturalism in education are:

  • To provide a holistic approach to learning that emphasizes the importance of physical, social, emotional, and cognitive development.
  • To create a learning environment that fosters curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking skills.
  • To encourage students to develop a deep appreciation for the natural world and to understand their role in preserving it.
  • To develop self-motivated learners who are capable of taking responsibility for their own learning.
  • To promote a child-centered approach to education that recognizes the unique needs and interests of each child.
  • To encourage experiential learning that allows students to learn through direct observation, exploration, and discovery.
  • To foster a sense of community and cooperation among students by promoting social and emotional development.
  • To develop students who are capable of solving real-world problems through collaboration, critical thinking, and creative problem-solving.
  • To promote the development of life skills, such as communication, decision-making, and leadership skills, that are necessary for success in today’s world.

Who is the Father of Naturalism in Education?

The father of Naturalism in Education is Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau was a French philosopher, writer, and composer who lived in the 18th century. His ideas about education were groundbreaking and had a significant impact on the field of education.

 

What Is the Rousseau Concept of Naturalism in Education?

Rousseau believed that education should be based on the natural development of the child, rather than on the artificial structures of society. He believed that children are naturally curious and have an innate desire to learn, and that it is the role of the teacher to facilitate that learning.

Rousseau’s ideas were influential in the development of progressive education, which emphasizes experiential learning, the importance of the child’s interests, and the role of the teacher as a facilitator rather than an authoritarian figure

 

Who Are the Proponents and Supporters of Naturalism in Education?

Proponents of Naturalism in Education are

  1. Jean-Jacques Rousseau – Rousseau was a French philosopher, writer, and composer who is considered the father of Naturalism in education. He believed that education should be based on the natural development of the child, and that children have an innate desire to learn.
  2. John Dewey – Dewey was an American philosopher, psychologist, and educator who is considered one of the most prominent proponents of Naturalism in education. He believed that education should be experiential and that learning should be based on the needs and interests of the child.
  3. Maria Montessori – Montessori was an Italian physician and educator who is best known for developing the Montessori method, an educational approach that emphasizes self-directed learning and hands-on experiences.
  4. Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi – Pestalozzi was a Swiss educator who believed in the importance of education for all, regardless of social class or background. He believed that education should be based on the child’s natural development and that learning should be experiential.
  5. Francis Parker-Parker was an American educator who believed that education should be student-centered and that learning should be based on the needs and interests of the child.

6 Comments

Leave a Comment